Mere Ownership of Agricultural Land Not Enough to Claim Agricultural Income, Rules ITAT

Read Time:-2 Min

(ITAT) The Income Tax Appellate Tribunal , Chennai Bench, has held that simply owning agricultural land is not sufficient to justify claims of agricultural income. In a significant ruling, the Tribunal upheld the addition of 50% of the assessee’s declared agricultural income as unexplained under Section 68 of the Income Tax Act.

The assessee had filed his return declaring substantial agricultural income.

A search was conducted at his premises, after which assessment proceedings were reopened.

Assessment Officer’s Findings

The taxpayer claimed ownership of about 47 acres of wet and dry land.

However, he failed to provide supporting evidence of cultivation, such as:

  • Land-revenue records (Chitta, Adangal)
  • Details of agricultural expenditure
  • Proof of sale of agricultural produce

Due to lack of documentation, the Assessing Officer treated the entire agricultural income as unexplained credit.

CIT(A) Observations

Only patta documents (land ownership) were submitted; no cultivation-related records were provided.

The assessee was unable to demonstrate actual agricultural operations.

Considering the circumstances, the CIT(A) accepted 50% of the declared agricultural income as reasonable and treated the remaining 50% as unexplained.

ITAT’s Decision

The Tribunal upheld the view of the CIT(A) and dismissed the assessee’s appeals for both assessment years.

Key observations:

Ownership of land does not automatically prove agricultural activity.

No evidence of expenditure, crop details, yield, or sales was produced.

Income claimed as agricultural income must be backed by verifiable records.

The ITAT concluded that treating half of the agricultural income as unexplained was justified.

Key Takeaways

Taxpayers claiming agricultural income must maintain:

  • Cultivation records
  • Expense details
  • Sale receipts or proof of buyers

Mere possession of agricultural land is not enough to support agricultural income claims.

Inaccurate or unsubstantiated claims may lead to additions under Section 68 as unexplained credits.



Join The Discussion

Related posts
Maharashtra Makes Land Records Fully Digital — A Big Win for Property Owners

The Maharashtra Revenue Department has made a landmark decision: digital land records such as the 7/12 extract,

Continue Reading
Clean Title Verification Checklist (Before You Buy Any Property)

Mother Deed Check and Original Title Deed Verify the full ownership chain (at least 30 years, if feasible).

Continue Reading
What is Dakhil Kharij — and Why It Matters for Property Owners

When you buy or inherit a property — be it land, a home, or a commercial building — the initial sale deed/registry only records that a sale took place.

Continue Reading
Recent Posts
WhatsApp Icon
WhatsApp
enquiry Icon
Enquiry Now
subscribe Icon
Subscribe Now